
 |
 |
 |
 |
The goal is simple - leave your brand better than you found it!
Whether your brand is a retail environment, or a product sold on
the shelf, the objectives are the same: increase the shoppers'
loyalty and trust in your brand ... and sales will be strong.
But the consumer perceptions of brands are multi dimensional; and
all too often brand managers forget just how important and sacred the
care of their brand is.
The "life" of a brand manager on a typical CPG product can be as
short as a few months or as long as 20 years. And in most cases,
there are no brand managers taking those responsibilities for our
retail partners. That's a mistake.
A prime responsibility of brand marketers is to take ownership
and be the caretaker of the brand. Your ultimate goal is to leave the
brand better than you found it, and to enhance its relationship with
shoppers. This responsibility rests with everyone in an organization
- it should be the primary responsibility of the CEO, as well as the
marketing, production, operations and administrative teams.
The brand belongs to every shopper and every employee who works
on it; and everyone has a stake and responsibility for its health and
well-being.
A shopper's relationship with your brand is built on honesty,
trustworthiness, reliability and predictability. Problems with brands
happen when the brand manager is not paying attention or gets lazy.
Every time a brand changes its image - whether it is the advertising,
packaging, logo, spokesperson, ingredients, and slogan -- the
relationship with the shopper changes. Uncertainty enters the
relationship and shoppers take a step back to see just what is going
to happen, while waiting for the reassurances that nothing will alter
the relationship they currently enjoy.
Positive relationships are based on human values: honesty,
integrity, reliability and trustworthiness. Successful brands add a
personality to these values. Wendy's Dave Thomas "brand" added a bit
of wit. Apple Computer "brand" adds innovation. Grey Poupon mustard
"brand" adds style. Tiger Woods and Michael Jordan, the "brands,"
have all of these -- and add a bit of charm as well.
Your brand image might contain all of these elements, but if they
are not communicated well...and the shopper doesn't "hear" them, your
brand will not be successful. At the core of a meaningful brand
relationship has to be good communication. Communications control the
brand, and good communications enhance the brand by consistently
communicating the brand's values and messages.
Today's shoppers have information and news sources at their
fingertips that brand managers could not have even imagined some 10
years ago. Brand loyalty and brand equity these days are simply
measures of how well we're communicating. And while mega-brands may
seem impenetrable, they are as fragile as the latest news report
makes them. Finally, in today's world it is the Internet - and the
opportunity for interactivity therein - that makes communication with
the brand a more important element in marketing that it has been in
the past.
Think of your brand as ... an egg, and I promise you will start
to understand the dynamics of the shoppers' relationship with your
brand.
An egg has been called the world's most perfect package. A shell
which allows air to pass through while protecting and nurturing a
life; and when subjected to equalized pressure on all surfaces is
unbreakable. But take that egg, and gently hit it with a fork and it
easily cracks open.
In the lifetime of your brand you should recognize that your
brand will be cracked wide open a number of times for varying
reasons. How the shopper reacts to those cracks will be based on
their ongoing relationship with the brand. How you handle the cracks
will be based on how well you understand your brand's relationship
with the shopper.
|
 |
|
 |
|

Click here for your
FREE subscription to
Facts, Figures, & the Future.

XR23 will provide you with the latest information and analysis of
technologies designed specifically for the retail environment.
CLICK HERE for
your FREE subscriptin.

The FMI U.S. Grocery Store Shopper Trends 2006 is available. Click on
the image above for more info.

This national survey examines shoppers' interest and attitudes, as
well as in-store activities, regarding health and nutrition,
consumers' efforts to manage their health, and the ways in which
health and nutritional concerns play out in purchase decisions at the
grocery store. This report brings a practical understanding of the
relationship between food shopping and health. Shopping for Health
2005 takes a special look at the family, exploring kids' consumption
of the recommended five-a-day, school lunches and family meal time.
Click on the image above.

FMI's Speaks is the annual state of the industry report for food
retailers. The report reviews the important changes and trends and
puts them into an industry perspective. It presents detailed
information on supermarket operations, store-level benchmarks and
outlines strategic and competitive issues. Click on the image above
for more info.

This annual report provides you with a complete financial picture of
the supermarket industry as well as the external business
environment, including key ratios, balance sheet, income statement
and statement of cash flow. The results are provided for the entire
industry as well as by annual sales for more accurate benchmarking.
Click on the image above for more info.

This annual report presents five-year financial data on key pharmacy
topics such as sales, margins, generic drugs and third-party plans.
Click on the image above for more info.

U.S. Hispanics are emerging as the marketing opportunity of the 21st
century. The fastest growing ethnic group in the United States,
Latinos far outspend the average U.S. supermarket shopper. Learn more
about U.S. Hispanic spending patterns, importance of products and
services, coupon usage and influence of advertising. Click on the
image above for more info.

ACNielsen's new book on category management, published by John Wiley
& Sons, is now available. To order, click on the image above. Or,
for discounted orders of 10 or more, contact Jeff Gould at Wiley at
jgould@wiley.com.
|
|
 |
 |


June 12, 2006
|
|
Standing out from the crowd
It's hard to believe that there's actually a business lesson in
an adventure movie like "Pirates of the Caribbean," yet the original
film has a perfect moment to consider. In one scene, the movie's hero
tells a pirate captain that there is no chance the pirate could beat
him in a fair fight.
The pirate responds simply: "That's hardly incentive for me to
fight fair."
It's a motto many in the industry should adopt. We're not talking
about cheating, but rather, as the pirate captain made clear, finding
a way to play to your strengths and not the strengths of your
competition.
Speaks, FMI's newest report of industry performance
provides ample incentive for operators to follow this very advice.
The report tracks a range of strategies for retailers, who combined
operate 15,000 stores, and paints a vivid picture of what works.
The clearest lesson is that companies with a defined strategy are
the ones growing sales fastest. And, interestingly enough, the group
that performed the strongest in the last year were independent
operators.
FMI asked retailers to identify a range of competitive
strategies: ranging from pricing tactics to emphasis on perishables
to creating a better overall shopping experience. Retailers then
graded their own performance. It was disappointing to find that most
said they were using every single strategy, resulting in mediocre
performance.
The one group that stood out was independent operators.
Independents were pursuing a limited group of merchandising
strategies. And that approach is paying off with independents
realizing higher grades.
Perhaps the biggest proof of success was that
independents-especially operators with 10 or fewer stores-reported
the best overall and same store sales gains (4.7% above previous
year's sales) of any of the groups FMI surveyed.
Of course, good numbers from a single year don't provide any
guarantee of future success, but it's a place to build. FMI also
recently released our annual study of shopper trends, which
demonstrates the complex and contradictory demands of today's
shoppers. What comes through clearly is that more than ever shoppers
seek value in all its different forms and they are prepared to shop a
wide variety of formats.
Understanding how shoppers define value is more complex. Today's
shoppers are increasingly diverse-in both their backgrounds and the
needs they want fulfilled. They use many different stores and
sometimes want completely different experiences from an individual
store they shop at on different days of the week.
This means the fight for shoppers is harder and more complex as
well. One answer won't work for all shoppers; in fact it may not work
all the time for a single shopper. But again, the results reported by
independents demonstrate that a good number of you are getting it
right.
What's clear is that every retailer needs to keep evaluating his
or her own stores and all the competition to find out the best way of
winning in the future. And the competitive message must come through
clearly to all your employees, who need to understand just how
challenging this battle is.
FMI's newest research studies: Speaks and Shopper Trends are
available at the FMI store at
www.fmi.org.
|
|
Crack the Retail C.O.D.E.
Manufacturers and retailers face many growth opportunities,
particularly at the store level.
However, optimizing store-by-store performance and adding
top-line growth can be difficult without information tools and a
framework. One way to consistently achieve this growth is through a
winning retail execution strategy: applying a simple, systematic
four-step process that we call 'Cracking the Retail C.O.D.E.'
The C.O.D.E. approach employs a series of critical steps that all
manufacturers should use to optimize their brand's success in the
market. This consumer-centric approach links your actions in the
store, where they matter the most, back to the consumers that are
most likely to purchase your brand.
The four steps to 'Cracking the C.O.D.E.' are:
1 - Consumer Profiling - accurately capturing the
demographic profile of the brand's consumer
2 - Opportunity Gapping - quantifying store-level
opportunities based on consumer demand potential
3 - Dynamic Clustering - grouping like stores using
multiple store attributes, including demographics, competition, and
upside opportunity
4 - Executing for the Consumer - based on steps 1-3,
developing store-level tactical plans and giving the field force the
right information to optimize in-store presence
This strategic approach provides a deeper understanding of the
consumer around a given store, measures the gap between actual and
potential demand, and offers an execution plan at the store and
cluster level that fully meets potential demand. The result is
improved execution, reduced out-of-stocks and overstocks, and
improved promotion performance and inventory management.
Many of our clients have embraced this approach, as have their
retail partners. In fact, a key ingredient in this process is the
utilization of POS data.
Our methodology "consumerizes" actual movement data, enabling
retail-specific, item-specific profiling. This, in turn, allows the
manufacturer to deliver granular analyses down to the SKU level. The
analyses are also retail specific, based on the retailer's own data -
adding power to the recommendations.
The manufacturers that have most successfully employed the
C.O.D.E. approach are those that leverage this information and
partner closely with their buyer; not only to improve their own
brand's performance, but to grow the overall category as well.
Retailers recognize the financial benefit they receive when their
suppliers incorporate the C.O.D.E. into their plans. They often want
manufacturers to use POS information to strategically advise them,
provide direction on how to improve category profitability, and
leverage their data to identify opportunity and action plans.
Therefore, many top retailers have agreed to allow us to use their
POS information in our analyses.
The information and tools are available. The next step lies with
manufacturers and retailers to partner together and apply the
C.O.D.E. to identify store-by-store opportunity and close the gap.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Natural, Organic Labels Bring Gilt Edge to Beef
There's no stampede yet for natural and organic beef-which corrals
only 1.6% of total beef dollar sales and 1.1% of beef unit volume at
retail in the United States-but the thunderous steps of consumers
demanding it may already be audible to butchers. This still-small
segment is growing up fast: Dollar sales leaped by 14.4% and pound
volume rose by 10.3% in the 12 months ended September 30, 2005 over
year-earlier performance, according to FreshLook data supplied to F3
by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA).
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
"Most beef is natural," says Randy Irion, director-retail
marketing, NCBA, because it meets the U.S. Department of Agriculture
definition as "minimally processed containing no additives." The
difference, however, is in the labeling. Branded natural programs are
becoming more available, and readily garner higher prices with their
perceived appeals and greater visibility. According to Irion, "prices
for all beef products offered in retail supermarkets average $3.63
per pound, compared with natural and organic beef products which
average $5.25 per pound." The $1.62 difference per pound represents a
45% premium that purchasers with higher discretionary income are
willing to spend.
Natural/organic labeled beef isn't for every supermarket, but
those in the right zip codes can use it to maximize category
performance. To raise product perceptions among certain consumers,
retailers can assort a variety of grain-fed or grass-finished beef,
or natural or certified organic varieties. Such activity appears to
be growing slightly, according to ACNielsen LabelTrends data for
food, drug and mass stores (excluding Wal-Mart) in the 52 weeks ended
March 25, 2006: Total active UPCs in beef rose to 351 from 333 a year
earlier; of that, branded beef nudged ahead to 285 from 271 and
private label edged up to 66 from 62. The greatest percentage gain in
any beef segment was "branded with a natural claim," up to 39 from
31, for a 26% expansion. Of that 39, 11 were brand new UPCs
introduced this past year, which represent a significant 28% of the
segment's current offerings. By comparison, new beef SKUs overall
numbered 65, or only about 19% of the retail beef mix.
Potential price pressures on beef may make it more important than
ever for retailers to merchandise in ways that can yield high
tickets. In a May 5 report, Wall Street analyst Thomas White of Best
Independent Research LLC stated that "the beef market has its own
woes. With Japan imposing a ban on U.S. beef, the domestic market is
likely to become saturated with beef otherwise meant for export. As
such, beef prices may head southward."
Branded beef currently accounts for 54% of the $655 million in
pre-packaged UPC-coded beef sales in FDM vs. the 46% share of private
label, according to LabelTrends data. Most striking in the sales
figures is the continued surge of branded beef with a natural claim
on the label: It soared 170%, 28%, 101% and 51% in four successive
years, from $7 million annually to $70 million annually in the period
ended March 25, 2006.
|
 |
|
Future Predictions from our C360 Audience of Experts
In our ACNielsen annual Consumer 360 conference, I had the pleasure
of leading a session on
U.S. Retailing - Past, Present & the Future. While we provided
our thoughts on the future of U.S retailing and the consumer or
industry trends that will have a big impact in driving growth
opportunities, we also asked the audience to provide their own view
on how the retail landscape will change between now and 2010.
About 80 members of the retail, manufacturer, and supplier
community were asked to address the following two issues:
Provide their assessment of which fifteen selected retail
channels would show strong growth, moderate growth or declining sales
by 2010.
Provide a ranking of ten issues related to consumer trends
(e.g., aging population, ethnic population growth) and industry
issues (rising fuel prices, RFID technology, Private Label, Wal-Mart
expansion, etc.) that would have the greatest impact on U.S.
retailing between now and 2010.
About seven of 10 audience members predicted that online
retailing would have the strongest growth. Kind of interesting
considering this was after hearing about how Amazon.com is now
selling more than 10,000 "non-perishable grocery items" online.
Nearly 60% or more of the audience expects strong growth from the
likes of Specialty Grocers (e.g., Whole Foods and Wild Oats), Drug
Stores and Supercenters. Moderate to declining growth was predicted
for Dollar Stores, Value Discounters (e.g., Aldi and Save-A-Lot),
Home Improvement, Convenience/Gas and the Warehouse Club channel.
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
Audience members predicted that declining growth will most likely
occur for traditional Mass Merchandisers, National Supermarket
chains, Liquor stores, Regional Supermarket chains, Convenience
stores, Electronics stores, and Pet Stores.
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
In terms of the ranking for consumer trends and industry issues
that will foster growth, aging population, ethnic population and
Wal-Mart expansion rounded out the top three with scores of 7.7, 6.9
and 6.7 respectfully). Organics and health & wellness, along with
gas/home heating prices, and retailer consolidation received scores
of 6.3, 5.9 and 5.7. Private Label received the number seven ranking
with an average score of 5.2, while ranking scores for overseas
production, frequent shopper programs, and RFID were below 4.0.
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
While predicting the future is an important ingredient for
manufacturers and retailers to look for growth opportunities, the
bigger challenge is putting plans in place that can turn
opportunities into real growth. Those who wait to see how their
competitors respond will likely find themselves in a catch-up mode
and doomed for marginal success.
For further information or to arrange a comprehensive
presentation on consumer shopping patterns, please contact Todd Hale
at thale@acnielsen.com or
859-905-4615.
|
 |
|
Mixed Results as Consumers Consider Product Sweetness Claims
Shoppers looking to lose or maintain weight often will turn to
specific claims when making choices - and one of easiest to build a
shopping list around is the issue of how much sugar is in a given
item. It is a particularly interesting category to examine, since it
illustrates whether consumers are being absolutist in their choices,
or looking to make compromises that will serve their purposes without
completely denying them the taste experiences they enjoy.
For example, when looking at all products in what is called the
"sweetener presence" category, ACNielsen reports that equivalized
unit volume for 2005 was up 4.5 percent to 14.2 billion. The bulk of
these were in the "no sugar added" segment, at 9.6 billion ... but
this figure actually represented a three percent decrease from the
previous year, suggesting that this particular claim may be losing
resonance with consumers.
"Less sugar," on the other hand - a qualified claim that implies
a more relaxed approach to dieting - may be the smallest segment in
this category at just 1.2 billion in equivalized unit volume last
year, but that number grew 150.3 percent. The "sugar-free" segment is
about three times its size, at 3.4 billion in equivalized unit
volume, up a healthy 5.5 percent last year.
In the "less sugar" category, the strongest performers were diet
aids, at 653 million (+702.2 percent), ready-to-eat cereal at 187.1
million (+34.7 percent), refrigerated fruit drinks at 138.4 million
(+57.7 percent), shelf-stable fruit drinks at 55.9 million (+99.1
percent), hot cereal at 9.1 million (+187 percent), and shelf-stable
cranberry juice, which showed the biggest percentage increase in the
segment at 8.4 million (+896 percent).
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
Product categories that were down in the "less sugar" area
included yogurt at 34.6 million (-24.9 percent) and frozen novelties
at 15.2 million (-20.3 percent).
The "no sugar added" category had a much more mixed performance,
with percentage decreases coming in three of the top six volume
categories when measured by equivalized unit volume. Down were
powdered soft drinks at 2.9 billion in equivalized unit volume(-9.5
percent), tea bags at 1.7 billion (-3.7 percent), and
non-refrigerated apple juice at 698 million (-4 percent). Up were
refrigerated orange juice at 1.5 billion (+0.4 percent), frozen
novelties at 615 million (+15.5 percent) and non-refrigerated juice
other than apple juice at 418.1 million (+9.9 percent).
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
Also showing decidedly negative annual results in the "sugar
free" category were top sellers such as vitamins at 325.8 million
(-22.2 percent), and diet colas at 185.5 million (-4.2 percent),
while segments such as diet supplements were at 187 million (+17.7
percent), and non refrigerated fruit drinks at 86 million (+57.1
percent).
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
|
 |
|
Build Trips, Basket Size and Profits with Analytics and Crisp Execution
The more precisely a retailer's marketing, merchandising, assortments
and pricing meet shopper need-states, the quicker consumers
automatically decide to visit that store over other competitors. A
store will win more trips and larger, lucrative baskets once shoppers
feel it's relevant and regularly helps them complete buying missions
on many kinds of shopping occasions.
A retailer can become central to consumers' buying patterns by
understanding how "...the needs consumers bring to particular
shopping occasions strongly influence the store choices they make-and
the same shopper has different needs from day to day and occasion to
occasion," said Troy Noble, Director-Retail Business Solutions at
ACNielsen, in his recent Consumer 360 presentation on
Trip Mission Analytics.
This well-known research nugget from an earlier study by the
Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council of North America helped Noble
make a point-that consumers are moving targets-and set the stage for
his own guidance on how retailers and brand marketing partners can
position stores well by satisfying myriad needs.
"Consumers don't shop for one reason. They have varying needs
across time. They may stock-up on Saturday, buy a few forgotten items
on Tuesday, and need something for their lunch on Thursday," he
described. "Need states vary by time, size of trip, and product areas
central to fulfillment .... Each can be served by a variety of
retailers."
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
Analyze trips so a store is better able to suit consumer
patterns, he urged. "Retailers and manufacturers can incorporate trip
insights into planning and start executing [because trip analytics
are] grounded in time-tested principles such as Category Management
and Loyalty Programs. They account for the larger role that
categories play in serving consumer needs [and] create a different
system for valuing the importance of categories, brands, segments and
individual products."
Further, trip insights explain the need-states felt by frequent
shoppers, and the metrics on trip types won and lost are "excellent
for tracking consumer loyalty levels and evaluating loyalty
initiatives," he added. Trip insights also help uncover purchase
patterns and deepen market basket analysis.
With trip analytics, retailers and manufacturers can determine
answers to critical questions, suggested Noble, such as:
How do consumers perceive you versus alternatives?
Are trips you thought were a strength actually dominated by
another outlet or driven by other products?
How does your store execution and financial performance stand
up?
Moreover, operators learn how specific categories either drive or
ride on specific need-states, and how they affect shopper loyalty by
trip mission.
Without high grades for different types of trips, a store is
vulnerable to competition from other kinds of formats. "The battle
centers on shaping consumer perception of your store as a trip
destination. To own more types of trips, the opportunity exists for
retailers and manufacturers to collaborate and serve their respective
objectives," said Noble, who unfolded a logical process for analyzing
trips.
First, he said, study transaction data to determine product
groupings, and aggregate displays because the right adjacencies lead
to larger baskets. Second, examine the most common trip clusters you
serve based on commonly occurring baskets with similar products and
spending levels. Third, execute against these need-states (through
displays, service, assortment, pricing) and communicate these
benefits aimed to improve shoppers' in-store experiences.
Noble underscored that trip analytics aren't the sole province of
large-format stores with a quote from Unilever's 2005 report,
Trip Management: The Next Big Thing: "Every kind of store can
vie for trip growth. The different ways people shop for groceries,
and their approving response to solutions that save time or money or
meet other needs, suggest that the most innovative retailers will
gain."
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
|
 |
|
New Media Sways Consumers and Prompts New Messaging Strategies
A new media credo is emerging for retailers and consumer product
goods marketers to obey: Your brand equity is the sum total of your
search results.
Perhaps it sounds unorthodox to believers in old media-print,
television and radio-but it seems undeniable as media habits shift
with American consumers' increasingly fast-paced, multitasking lives.
"If marketers don't change too, they'll be using traditional
communications that consumers will no longer be paying attention to,"
cautioned Steve Farella, chief executive officer, TargetCast, and
Mark Green, senior vice president, ACNielsen, in their recent
Consumer 360 presentation,
Consumer Targeting in a Media-Driven World.
The compelling appeal of online media content is its digital
format, which makes it mobile and manageable for consumers. It
empowers people who want to shape information for their individual
needs. For example, they noted, consumers can:
Choose it: search, record, save and manage
Change it: cut, paste, delete and blend favorite bits
Create it: write, film, record and build
Share it: send, post and collaborate
With such control, it's not surprising that on an average day 94
million American adults use the Internet-primarily to read or send
e-mail (77%), search for information (63%), get news (46%) and do
job-related research (29%), according to Pew Internet & American Life
Project study of September 2005.
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
Nor is it surprising that Farella and Green both point to new
media as the future environment that will matter most to retailers
and CPG firms aiming to target consumers, both adult and children.
They observe that people are flocking to:
Blogospheres - the growing universe of Blogs, Photoblogs and
Vblogs
Podcasts - multimedia distribution of music, commentary and
videos
Synthetic worlds - alternative online worlds with residents
and virtual wealth
Wikis - collaborative spaces such as Wikipedia
Folksonomies - collaborative cataloging arising in Web-based
communities
The shift is happening fast: Veronis, Suhler, Stevenson data
showed that media was fragmented in 2003, and was led by traditional
television (1,745 hours per year), radio (1,002) and recorded music
(184). "That's also when instant messaging began to surge among the
young-they already consider e-mail passé-followed by blogs and iPods
in 2004, and mobile video in 2005," described Farella and Green.
Even more recent data show high percentages of women, men and
teens using the Internet "to get everything," they added. Topping the
list: music, video games, electronics, entertainment choices,
technology, and health and medical information, according to the
August 2005 Intelliseek Consumer-Generated Media Study.
Moreover, people connect in digital neighborhoods formed around
interests, and word-of-mouth that affects brand loyalty "travels like
a virus in the social network medium," the speakers noted.
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
To target consumers in this new media-driven world, Farella and
Green urged retailers and CPG marketers to "segment consumers into
touchable groups. Find relevant and opportunistic engagement points.
And look for connection points between consumers around common
product or media interests."
"Become a new marketer," they added. "Place your emphasis on
connecting, influencing and tactically engaging consumers. Maintain
relevant key performance indicators by understanding and linking
media and business metrics."
|
 |
 |
ACNielsen estimates that in 2005, over $4.8 billion was spent
across all retail channels in the skin care preparations category
which includes acne remedies, face cleansers/creams/lotions, hand &
body lotions, hand cream, skin bleaching/toning products, all purpose
skin cream, special purpose skin cream, suntan lotions/oils/etc,
suntan sunscreens & sunblocks.
The following slides indicate the percentage of households
who buy each type of skin care preparations, a sampling of higher
indexing household types who buy products in the overall skin care
preparations category, and channel share of category dollar sales.
|
 |
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
|
 |
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
|
 |
Click on thumbnail to enlarge, or click here.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Facts, Figures and the Future is copyrighted and may not be
reproduced without prior permission. For more information about the
publication, please contact Phil Lempert at 323-860-3070 or via
e-mail at
PLempert@FactsFiguresFuture.com
|
|
 |